Session recordings, heatmaps, and on-site surveys — see exactly how visitors use your website.
Analytics comparison
Pricing, pros, cons, and ideal use cases — side by side.
Session recordings, heatmaps, and on-site surveys — see exactly how visitors use your website.
An automated evaluation and guardrails platform for LLMs, focused on rigorously detecting hallucinations, unsafe outputs, and other failures.
| Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar) | Patronus AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | FreemiumHotjar's old plans were Basic free (35 sessions/day), Plus $32/month and Business $80/month; new accounts open on Contentsquare, whose free plan covers 200,000 sessions a month with a 15-day Growth trial, and whose paid plans were not re-verified in early October 2026. | PaidUsage-based and enterprise pricing, quoted per organization. |
| Category | Analytics | Analytics |
| Ideal for | EcommerceAgenciesSaaSAny SMB with a website | Enterprises that need rigorous, automated LLM testingRegulated teams requiring defensible evaluation evidenceOrgs scoring for hallucination and safety |
Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar) is the lighter-weight option (Freemium), while Patronus AI sits higher on the pricing ladder (Paid). Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar) is built around ecommerce; Patronus AI leans more toward enterprises that need rigorous, automated llm testing. Shortlist the one whose strengths line up with your biggest constraint.
Get one AI workflow a week showing Analytics in a real stack — what they cost, and where each one breaks.