WorkflowStack AI
WorkflowsIndustriesToolsGuidesAI QuizBlogEnterprise
Get Free Workflows
WorkflowStack AI

Practical AI workflows for SMB operators and enterprise teams. No fluff. No hype. Just what ships.

Library

  • All Workflows
  • Industries
  • Enterprise
  • Tools
  • Guides

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Newsletter
  • Contact

Stay Updated

Weekly workflow ideas for operators and enterprise teams.

Get Free Workflows →

© 2026 Blueteem LLC. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyTerms of Service
HomeToolsSplunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo) vs Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar)

Analytics comparison

Splunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo) vs Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar)

Pricing, pros, cons, and ideal use cases — side by side.

Splunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo) logo
Splunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo)Enterprise

An enterprise platform for evaluating, monitoring, and guarding AI agents and LLM applications, including real-time protection against unsafe outputs.

Visit Splunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo)
Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar) logo
Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar)Freemium

Session recordings, heatmaps, and on-site surveys — see exactly how visitors use your website.

Visit Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar)

At a glance

Splunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo)Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar)
PricingEnterpriseEnterprise pricing, quoted per organization.FreemiumHotjar's old plans were Basic free (35 sessions/day), Plus $32/month and Business $80/month; new accounts open on Contentsquare, whose free plan covers 200,000 sessions a month with a 15-day Growth trial, and whose paid plans were not re-verified in early October 2026.
CategoryAnalyticsAnalytics
Ideal for
Enterprises running agents and LLM apps at scaleRegulated organizations needing runtime safeguardsTeams needing both evaluation and live monitoring
EcommerceAgenciesSaaSAny SMB with a website

Pros & cons

Splunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo)

Pros
  • Evaluation, monitoring, and runtime guardrails in one platform
  • Real-time detection of unsafe or off-policy outputs
  • Metrics that work without ground-truth labels
  • Built for enterprise scale
Cons
  • Enterprise pricing and procurement
  • More than small teams or simple apps need
  • Onboarding is a real implementation effort

Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar)

Pros
  • Watch real user sessions
  • Heatmaps and click maps
  • On-site surveys built in
  • Free tier for testing
Cons
  • Can slow down sites
  • Privacy considerations
  • Sample-based on lower plans

Which should you choose?

Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar) is the lighter-weight option (Freemium), while Splunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo) sits higher on the pricing ladder (Enterprise). Splunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo) is built around enterprises running agents and llm apps at scale; Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar) leans more toward ecommerce. Shortlist the one whose strengths line up with your biggest constraint.

Still deciding between Splunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo) and Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar)?

Get one AI workflow a week showing Analytics in a real stack — what they cost, and where each one breaks.

See all Splunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo) alternatives →See all Contentsquare (formerly Hotjar) alternatives →Browse all Analytics tools →