Month-end close and practice management for bookkeeping firms, with AI that catches coding errors before the client sees them.
Finance & Admin comparison
Double (formerly Keeper) vs Expensify
Pricing, pros, cons, and ideal use cases — side by side.
ExpensifyPaid
Expense reports and receipt scanning that employees will actually use, plus a corporate card and, since mid-2026, natural-language setup, AI workflow agents in beta, and an MCP server.
At a glance
| Double (formerly Keeper) | Expensify | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | PaidNot fully published. Accounting firms are billed per connected client on a month-to-month basis with mix-and-match features; the Tax Suite is included with a $200/month annual commitment, and team email is a $10/month per connected mailbox add-on. Internal finance teams are quoted an annual flat rate. Ask specifically how a client with multiple entities is counted. | PaidSubmit plan free for individuals; Collect $5 per unique member/month; Control is listed as "Custom pricing, as low as $9 per active member/month" on the vendor's pricing page (rendered in a browser; it is client-side). Expensify's help center spells out the Control formula: $18 per member/month on an annual subscription plus $36 per active member above the subscription size, pay-per-use $36 per active member/month, discounted up to 50% (to $9 and $18) with Expensify Card spend. As read in early October 2026. |
| Category | Finance & Admin | Finance & Admin |
| Ideal for | Bookkeeping and accounting firms with recurring monthly clientsOutsourced CFO and controller practicesFirms standardising a repeatable month-end closeInternal finance teams closing multiple entities | SMBs whose employees still email receipts to the bookkeeperFinance teams on QuickBooks Online, Xero, NetSuite, or Sage IntacctCompanies that reimburse travel and mileage more than they issue cardsMid-market finance teams that want an AI and MCP surface over expenses |
Pros & cons
Double (formerly Keeper)
Pros
- Purpose-built for the firm workflow, not the business owner
- AI review catches coding errors before the client review call
- Client question queue replaces chasing answers over email
- Per-client pricing scales with your book rather than seats
- Platinum partner in Intuit's App Partner Program
Cons
- Full rate card is not published — you need a quote
- Layered on QuickBooks or Xero; it is not a general ledger
- Wrong product for a business owner doing their own books
- The Keeper-to-Double rebrand means older reviews and help articles use the old name
- Value depends on the whole team adopting one close process
Expensify
Pros
- SmartScan receipt capture is the most-praised feature in the category
- Strong accounting integrations — QuickBooks, NetSuite, Xero, Sage Intacct
- Natural-language setup, AI agents in beta, and an MCP server
- Collect price published per member; the Control formula is documented in the help center
- Mature product with a very large review base (third-party ratings around 4.5/5)
Cons
- Control pricing roughly doubles without the Expensify Card
- Capterra reviewers report duplicate-expense and sync bugs
- Legacy-to-New Expensify migration is still in progress — two UIs in the wild
- Control is custom-priced — the published formula lives in the help center, not the pricing page
- Public company with revenue down year over year in Q2 2026, per its own results
Which should you choose?
Double (formerly Keeper) is built around bookkeeping and accounting firms with recurring monthly clients; Expensify leans more toward smbs whose employees still email receipts to the bookkeeper. Shortlist the one whose strengths line up with your biggest constraint.
Still deciding between Double (formerly Keeper) and Expensify?
Get one AI workflow a week showing Finance & Admin in a real stack — what they cost, and where each one breaks.