OpenAI first-party agent toolkit — a visual Agent Builder, embeddable ChatKit UI, a connector registry, and evals, billed at plain API rates.
Agent Development comparison
Pricing, pros, cons, and ideal use cases — side by side.
OpenAI first-party agent toolkit — a visual Agent Builder, embeddable ChatKit UI, a connector registry, and evals, billed at plain API rates.
An open-source SDK from Microsoft for integrating LLMs into applications, with a focus on enterprise-grade orchestration in C#, Python, and Java.
| OpenAI AgentKit | Semantic Kernel | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | FreemiumNo separate platform fee. Agent Builder design is free; you pay standard OpenAI API model and storage rates for execution. As a reference point, GPT-5.2 runs roughly $1.75 per million input tokens and $14 per million output tokens, with GPT-5 mini at about $0.25 per million input tokens. | FreeOpen-source (MIT), free. Costs come from the model APIs you call. |
| Category | Agent Development | Agent Development |
| Ideal for | Product teams embedding agents into their own softwareEngineering teams already building on the OpenAI APIStartups that want agent scaffolding without a platform feeTeams standardizing evals alongside agent development | .NET and Java enterprise development teamsOrgs embedding AI into existing applicationsMicrosoft-ecosystem shops |
Semantic Kernel is the lighter-weight option (Free), while OpenAI AgentKit sits higher on the pricing ladder (Freemium). OpenAI AgentKit is built around product teams embedding agents into their own software; Semantic Kernel leans more toward .net and java enterprise development teams. Shortlist the one whose strengths line up with your biggest constraint.
Get one AI workflow a week showing Agent Development in a real stack — what they cost, and where each one breaks.