An open-source framework from Microsoft Research for building multi-agent applications, where agents converse to solve tasks together.
Agent Development comparison
Pricing, pros, cons, and ideal use cases — side by side.
An open-source framework from Microsoft Research for building multi-agent applications, where agents converse to solve tasks together.
OpenAI first-party agent toolkit — a visual Agent Builder, embeddable ChatKit UI, a connector registry, and evals, billed at plain API rates.
| Microsoft AutoGen | OpenAI AgentKit | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | FreeOpen-source (MIT), free to use. You pay only for the underlying model API calls. | FreemiumNo separate platform fee. Agent Builder design is free; you pay standard OpenAI API model and storage rates for execution. As a reference point, GPT-5.2 runs roughly $1.75 per million input tokens and $14 per million output tokens, with GPT-5 mini at about $0.25 per million input tokens. |
| Category | Agent Development | Agent Development |
| Ideal for | Engineering teams prototyping multi-agent systemsResearch and innovation groupsTeams already in the Microsoft ecosystem | Product teams embedding agents into their own softwareEngineering teams already building on the OpenAI APIStartups that want agent scaffolding without a platform feeTeams standardizing evals alongside agent development |
Microsoft AutoGen is the lighter-weight option (Free), while OpenAI AgentKit sits higher on the pricing ladder (Freemium). Microsoft AutoGen is built around engineering teams prototyping multi-agent systems; OpenAI AgentKit leans more toward product teams embedding agents into their own software. Shortlist the one whose strengths line up with your biggest constraint.
Get one AI workflow a week showing Agent Development in a real stack — what they cost, and where each one breaks.