Make.comFreemium
Visual automation platform that connects thousands of apps with no-code workflows.
Automation comparison
Pricing, pros, cons, and ideal use cases — side by side.
Visual automation platform that connects thousands of apps with no-code workflows.
An "AI workforce" platform for building specialist agents across sales, support, marketing, and ops — with evaluation and model routing built in.
| Make.com | Relevance AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | FreemiumFree plan with 1,000 credits a month and 2 active scenarios. Core $12/month on annual billing ($16 monthly), Pro $21 ($28 monthly), Teams $38 ($51 monthly), each with 10,000 credits a month; Enterprise custom. The billing unit is now credits, one per module action, rather than operations. As read on the vendor's pricing page in early October 2026. | EnterpriseNot published. The pricing page shows a single Enterprise offering with a talk-to-sales button; the per-task rates the vendor once published no longer appear on it. As read on the vendor's pricing page in early October 2026. |
| Category | Automation | Automation |
| Ideal for | Any SMBAgenciesRecruitersEcommerce | Sales and revenue ops teams automating research and enrichmentCustomer success teams handling renewals at scaleMarketing and content operationsDepartmental buyers who want agents without a platform-engineering project |
Make.com is the lighter-weight option (Freemium), while Relevance AI sits higher on the pricing ladder (Enterprise). Make.com is built around any smb; Relevance AI leans more toward sales and revenue ops teams automating research and enrichment. Shortlist the one whose strengths line up with your biggest constraint.
Get one AI workflow a week showing Automation in a real stack — what they cost, and where each one breaks.