An enterprise platform for evaluating, monitoring, and guarding AI agents and LLM applications, including real-time protection against unsafe outputs.
Analytics comparison
Pricing, pros, cons, and ideal use cases — side by side.
An enterprise platform for evaluating, monitoring, and guarding AI agents and LLM applications, including real-time protection against unsafe outputs.
An observability and evaluation platform for LLM and agent applications — tracing, datasets, automated evals, and production monitoring in one place.
| Splunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo) | LangSmith | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | EnterpriseEnterprise pricing, quoted per organization. | FreemiumFree developer tier. Paid Plus and Enterprise plans add seats, longer trace retention, and deployment options. |
| Category | Analytics | Analytics |
| Ideal for | Enterprises running agents and LLM apps at scaleRegulated organizations needing runtime safeguardsTeams needing both evaluation and live monitoring | Teams running agents in productionEnterprises needing eval and monitoringEngineering orgs standardizing AI observability |
LangSmith is the lighter-weight option (Freemium), while Splunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo) sits higher on the pricing ladder (Enterprise). Splunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo) is built around enterprises running agents and llm apps at scale; LangSmith leans more toward teams running agents in production. Shortlist the one whose strengths line up with your biggest constraint.
Get one AI workflow a week showing Analytics in a real stack — what they cost, and where each one breaks.