WorkflowStack AI
WorkflowsIndustriesToolsGuidesAI QuizBlogEnterprise
Get Free Workflows
WorkflowStack AI

Practical AI workflows for SMB operators and enterprise teams. No fluff. No hype. Just what ships.

Library

  • All Workflows
  • Industries
  • Enterprise
  • Tools
  • Guides

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Newsletter
  • Contact

Stay Updated

Weekly workflow ideas for operators and enterprise teams.

Get Free Workflows →

© 2026 Blueteem LLC. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyTerms of Service
HomeToolsSplunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo) vs LangSmith

Analytics comparison

Splunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo) vs LangSmith

Pricing, pros, cons, and ideal use cases — side by side.

Splunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo) logo
Splunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo)Enterprise

An enterprise platform for evaluating, monitoring, and guarding AI agents and LLM applications, including real-time protection against unsafe outputs.

Visit Splunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo)
LangSmith logo
LangSmithFreemium

An observability and evaluation platform for LLM and agent applications — tracing, datasets, automated evals, and production monitoring in one place.

Visit LangSmith

At a glance

Splunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo)LangSmith
PricingEnterpriseEnterprise pricing, quoted per organization.FreemiumFree developer tier. Paid Plus and Enterprise plans add seats, longer trace retention, and deployment options.
CategoryAnalyticsAnalytics
Ideal for
Enterprises running agents and LLM apps at scaleRegulated organizations needing runtime safeguardsTeams needing both evaluation and live monitoring
Teams running agents in productionEnterprises needing eval and monitoringEngineering orgs standardizing AI observability

Pros & cons

Splunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo)

Pros
  • Evaluation, monitoring, and runtime guardrails in one platform
  • Real-time detection of unsafe or off-policy outputs
  • Metrics that work without ground-truth labels
  • Built for enterprise scale
Cons
  • Enterprise pricing and procurement
  • More than small teams or simple apps need
  • Onboarding is a real implementation effort

LangSmith

Pros
  • End-to-end tracing for complex agent runs
  • Datasets and automated evals in CI
  • Production monitoring for quality and cost
  • Framework-agnostic
Cons
  • Most seamless within the LangChain ecosystem
  • Trace volume can drive cost at scale
  • Eval design is still real work

Which should you choose?

LangSmith is the lighter-weight option (Freemium), while Splunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo) sits higher on the pricing ladder (Enterprise). Splunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo) is built around enterprises running agents and llm apps at scale; LangSmith leans more toward teams running agents in production. Shortlist the one whose strengths line up with your biggest constraint.

Still deciding between Splunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo) and LangSmith?

Get one AI workflow a week showing Analytics in a real stack — what they cost, and where each one breaks.

See all Splunk Agent Observability (formerly Galileo) alternatives →See all LangSmith alternatives →Browse all Analytics tools →