Headless browser infrastructure for AI agents. Built for Stagehand and Claude-style "computer-using" agents that need to navigate real websites.
Automation comparison
Pricing, pros, cons, and ideal use cases — side by side.
Headless browser infrastructure for AI agents. Built for Stagehand and Claude-style "computer-using" agents that need to navigate real websites.
A visual AI automation platform where the nodes are AI steps rather than API calls — closer to an agent builder than to Zapier.
| Browserbase | Gumloop | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | FreemiumFree $0/month with 3 concurrent browsers and 1 browser hour. Developer $20/month with 25 concurrent browsers and 100 browser hours, then $0.12 per hour. Startup $99/month with 100 concurrent browsers and 500 hours, then $0.10 per hour. Scale is custom. As read on the vendor's pricing page in early October 2026. | PaidPro from $37/month with 20,000 credits, 35+ models, unlimited agents and seats, plus an 8% orchestration fee. Enterprise custom with RBAC, audit logs, and MCP server hosting. 14-day free trial on both. |
| Category | Automation | Automation |
| Ideal for | Agencies building AI agentsAI-native SaaSTechnical SMBsOperations teams running competitive intelligence | Marketing and growth teams automating research and contentOperations teams doing document and data processingAgencies building client-facing automationsTechnical-adjacent operators who do not want to write code |
Browserbase is the lighter-weight option (Freemium), while Gumloop sits higher on the pricing ladder (Paid). Browserbase is built around agencies building ai agents; Gumloop leans more toward marketing and growth teams automating research and content. Shortlist the one whose strengths line up with your biggest constraint.
Get one AI workflow a week showing Automation in a real stack — what they cost, and where each one breaks.