Arcade.devFreemium
One control point for the actions agents take in real systems — user-scoped auth, 8,000+ permission-aware tools, and an audit trail per action.
AI Infrastructure comparison
Arcade.dev vs Unstructured
Pricing, pros, cons, and ideal use cases — side by side.
UnstructuredFreemium
A platform for turning messy enterprise documents — PDFs, slides, emails, scans — into clean, structured data ready for RAG and LLMs.
At a glance
| Arcade.dev | Unstructured | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | FreemiumFree $0/month with 2,000 auth events and 2,000 tool calls, community support, no credit card. Team $25/month plus usage at $0.10 per auth event and $0.01 per tool call, with next-business-day email support. Enterprise is custom with annual bundles, cloud, VPC or air-gapped deployment, SSO, RBAC, audit logs, private registry access, and 24/7 SLA. Priced by what agents do, not per seat. | FreemiumOpen-source libraries are free. The managed API and platform are sold on usage-based paid plans. |
| Category | AI Infrastructure | AI Infrastructure |
| Ideal for | Platform teams putting agents into production against real SaaS systemsSecurity teams that have blocked an agent project over service-account accessCompanies building internal agents on Salesforce, Google Workspace, or SlackTeams standing up MCP servers who need auth and audit around them | Enterprises building RAG over real document setsTeams handling PDFs, scans, and complex file typesData engineers preparing content for LLMs |
Pros & cons
Arcade.dev
Pros
- Agents act as a specific user, not a god-mode service account
- Published usage pricing in a category that is usually demo-gated
- 8,000+ pre-built permission-aware tools plus custom MCP support
- Per-action audit trail — the artifact security actually asks for
- SOC 2 certified, with VPC and air-gapped deployment options
Cons
- Another layer between your agent and its tools — added latency and a new dependency
- Usage pricing on auth events can surprise you at high user counts
- Only worth it once agents take write actions, not just read
- Requires engineering integration; not a business-user product
- Tool coverage is broad but you should verify your specific systems
Unstructured
Pros
- Purpose-built for messy real-world documents
- Handles PDFs, tables, scans, and many formats
- Connectors for common enterprise data sources
- Open-source or managed API
Cons
- Complex document extraction is never perfect
- Managed API costs scale with document volume
- One stage of the pipeline — not end-to-end RAG
Which should you choose?
Arcade.dev is built around platform teams putting agents into production against real saas systems; Unstructured leans more toward enterprises building rag over real document sets. Shortlist the one whose strengths line up with your biggest constraint.
Still deciding between Arcade.dev and Unstructured?
Get one AI workflow a week showing AI Infrastructure in a real stack — what they cost, and where each one breaks.