Arcade.devFreemium
One control point for the actions agents take in real systems — user-scoped auth, 8,000+ permission-aware tools, and an audit trail per action.
AI Infrastructure comparison
Arcade.dev vs E2B
Pricing, pros, cons, and ideal use cases — side by side.
E2BFreemium
Isolated sandboxes where an AI agent can run the code it just wrote without touching anything you care about.
At a glance
| Arcade.dev | E2B | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | FreemiumFree $0/month with 2,000 auth events and 2,000 tool calls, community support, no credit card. Team $25/month plus usage at $0.10 per auth event and $0.01 per tool call, with next-business-day email support. Enterprise is custom with annual bundles, cloud, VPC or air-gapped deployment, SSO, RBAC, audit logs, private registry access, and 24/7 SLA. Priced by what agents do, not per seat. | FreemiumHobby is free with $100 one-time usage credits, community support, sessions up to 1 hour, and 20 concurrent sandboxes; no credit card required. Pro is $150/month with customisable sandbox CPU and RAM, sessions up to 24 hours, and 100 concurrent sandboxes, expandable by purchase to 1,100. Enterprise is custom. Compute is billed per second on vCPU, RAM, and storage on top of the plan fee. |
| Category | AI Infrastructure | AI Infrastructure |
| Ideal for | Platform teams putting agents into production against real SaaS systemsSecurity teams that have blocked an agent project over service-account accessCompanies building internal agents on Salesforce, Google Workspace, or SlackTeams standing up MCP servers who need auth and audit around them | Teams shipping code-interpreter or data-analysis agent featuresAI product companies that must isolate customer-triggered code executionPlatform engineers building internal agent runtimesAnyone letting an LLM run generated code against real data |
Pros & cons
Arcade.dev
Pros
- Agents act as a specific user, not a god-mode service account
- Published usage pricing in a category that is usually demo-gated
- 8,000+ pre-built permission-aware tools plus custom MCP support
- Per-action audit trail — the artifact security actually asks for
- SOC 2 certified, with VPC and air-gapped deployment options
Cons
- Another layer between your agent and its tools — added latency and a new dependency
- Usage pricing on auth events can surprise you at high user counts
- Only worth it once agents take write actions, not just read
- Requires engineering integration; not a business-user product
- Tool coverage is broad but you should verify your specific systems
E2B
Pros
- Real isolation for agent-executed code — the correct security posture
- Sub-second sandbox start times
- Free tier with $100 credits is enough for a genuine evaluation
- Concurrency limits are published and purchasable
- Per-second billing means short runs are genuinely cheap
Cons
- The $150 Pro step is steep relative to the free tier
- Compute is billed on top of the plan fee — the plan price is not your bill
- Long-lived idle sandboxes are the standard way teams overspend
- Developer infrastructure — no value without engineering
- You still own the prompt-injection risk; isolation limits blast radius, it does not prevent bad instructions
Which should you choose?
Arcade.dev is built around platform teams putting agents into production against real saas systems; E2B leans more toward teams shipping code-interpreter or data-analysis agent features. Shortlist the one whose strengths line up with your biggest constraint.
Still deciding between Arcade.dev and E2B?
Get one AI workflow a week showing AI Infrastructure in a real stack — what they cost, and where each one breaks.